翻訳と辞書
Words near each other
・ Medford Township Public Schools
・ Medford Township, Steele County, Minnesota
・ Medford Township, Walsh County, North Dakota
・ Medford Turnpike
・ Medford, Indiana
・ Medford, Maine
・ Medford, Massachusetts
・ Medford, Minnesota
・ Medford, New Jersey
・ Medford, New York
・ Medford, Nova Scotia
・ Medford, Oklahoma
・ Medford, Oregon
・ Medford, Wisconsin
・ MEDFORIST
Medforth v Blake
・ Medfra, Alaska
・ Medgadget
・ Medgar Evers
・ Medgar Evers College
・ Medgaz
・ Medge Hall Halt
・ Medghal District
・ Medgidia
・ Medgidia clinker storage facility
・ Medgidia River
・ Medgoen Singsurat
・ Medgrid
・ Medgyesbodzás
・ Medgyesegyháza


Dictionary Lists
翻訳と辞書 辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ]
スポンサード リンク

Medforth v Blake : ウィキペディア英語版
Medforth v Blake

''Medforth v Blake'' () (EWCA Civ 1482 ) is a UK insolvency law case concerning the duties of a receiver and manager in the United Kingdom, over and above a duty of good faith, as to the manner in which he conducts a business.
==Facts==
Medforth conducted pig farming on a large scale, with a £2 million annual turnover and a herd of 3000 sows, 120 boars and 11000 weaners. His bank appointed receivers who ran the business from February 1984 to September 1988, when Medforth found a new source of finance and repaid the bank. Medforth advised the receivers that they could get large discounts from foodstuffs suppliers, amounting to £1000 a week, which he had previously been able to obtain, but the receivers did not attempt to obtain any such discount until early 1988. In February 1990, Medforth sued them for failure to obtain such commercial discounts either as breach of a duty of care, or if the only duty was that of good faith, such a breach (even though it did not arise from any deceit or of any conscious or deliberate impropriety).
In the Queen's Bench Division, McGonigal J ruled:
#the Receivers, when exercising their power of sale, owed Mr Medforth, over and above a duty of good faith, an equitable duty of care,
#the standard of that duty of care was the standard of a reasonably competent receiver
#no sensible distinction could be drawn between the exercise of a power of sale and the exercise of a power to manage a business, that the power to manage was ancillary to the power of sale and that the equitable duty of care was applicable to both
The receivers appealed to the Court of Appeal.

抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)
ウィキペディアで「Medforth v Blake」の詳細全文を読む



スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース

Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.